A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall compensate for the amount of damage which the applicant for compensation has remitted to him.

Punishment of the crime

On September 9, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment and a fine of five million won at the Incheon District Court for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the imprisonment on June 17, 2013, and on October 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment at the Seoul East District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 17, 2015.

"2015 Highest 37"

1. On July 21, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “IWC Gapha model is sold” posted by G on the bulletin board of “F, an Internet site for the medium relay transactions,” and that “IWC Gapha model is sold.” On the same day, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “BWC Gapha Dob01 Dob01 Dogs are sold” on the above website. The Defendant made a false statement to the victim E by misrepresenting the victim E to sell the visibility.

However, in fact, the defendant had the intent to acquire the above visibility from G by allowing the victim to pay the price, but did not have the victim's intention or ability to sell the Bring dysphering dysphering dys.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, caused the victim to transfer KRW 5,400,00 to the G name account under the pretext of visibility on the same day, and caused Kwikset service to deliver IWC G’s visibility model and receive property from G.

2. On July 21, 2014, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “the sale of roex type e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail 2” posted by H on the above website bulletin, and expressed H’s intent to purchase. On the same day, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “broping e-mail e-mail b01 e-mail e-mail b01 e-mail e-mail b01” on the above website, and made a false statement to the victim C who reported the false statement to the effect that he sells H by misrepresenting h.

However, the Defendant, however, has the victim pay the price from H by means of having the victim pay it.