logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.10.22 2020누35730
체류자격부여불허결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court is that the reasoning for this case is stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except that the Plaintiff’s “Evidence and Evidence submitted by the Plaintiff” in the third 6th 6th th 6th s of the first instance judgment is “the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff at the first and the first instance court,” and therefore, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow