(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.01.18 2015나23407

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.01.18 2015나23407

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiffs' claims expanded in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

annex 1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party's status 1) The Gyeongbukdo elderly group is as follows: (a) seven aggregate extraction sites (P district, V district, T district, X district, Z district, Z district, R district and AB district among the land that constitutes the Nakdongdong River, a national river within the jurisdiction of the elderly military group, with the consent of the Republic of Korea; and (b) the aggregate extraction site in this case.

(2) The Plaintiffs are companies that perform the extraction of aggregate, selection, and on-the-job operation of the instant aggregate extraction site by being awarded a contract with the aged group, and received service charges.

3) Defendant G, H, I, J, and K are the police assigned for special guard employed in the aged group. Defendant N, L, and M are two employees employed in life contracts belonging to the aged group. The Defendants, one police officer assigned for special guard and two employees employed in the management of the aggregate extraction site of this case, and performed duties, such as the expense of the aggregate extraction site of this case, the restriction on access of aggregate transport vehicles, the number of sales prices, and the settlement of accounts. B. The contents of the contract between the aged group and the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) Plaintiff A corporation (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the other Plaintiffs, on November 1, 2006, signed a contract with the above Plaintiff on behalf of the aged group, and signed a contract with the same elderly group for the extraction of aggregate of this case from November 1, 2006 to October 31, 207 (hereinafter “the aggregate extraction contract between the Plaintiff and the new group of employees,” and the aggregate extraction of the aggregate of this case’s main equipment to be received for the aggregate extraction of this case’s area.

(No. 10 No. 1 through 6). The main contents of each of the instant contracts are as follows:

유사 판례

-대구고등법원 2015.11.25 2014나22148

-대구고등법원 2017.1.18.선고 2015나23407 판결

-대구고등법원 2015.11.25 2013나21537

-대구지방법원 2015.09.18 2013가합10769

-대구지방법원서부지원 2013.10.24 2012가합1956