Defendant

Punishment A for a fine of KRW 1.5 million shall be determined by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, Defendant B, and C.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the occupants of the Nam-gu apartment building E in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and the defendant B and the defendant C are the same representatives of the above apartment building, and the victim F is the representative of the previous occupants of the above apartment building, and the defendants and the victims have claimed and suffered conflict between them.

The Defendants have continuously raised doubt that the victim had purchased the franchise site as the parking lot site without considering the suitability of the business of the inanan city market, which is the purchaser of the above apartment parking lot, during the period when the victim was in the representative of the occupants. However, it was well known that the parking lot was not constructed, and that the victim did not purchase the franchise site as the parking lot site in return for illegal solicitation. This circumstance was already reported several times through the media, and that the Defendants did not purchase the franchise site as the parking lot site in return for illegal solicitation.

On the other hand, the defendants have continuously raised doubt that the victim selected the construction company with the acceptance of bribe in relation to the selection of the construction company of the above apartment complex as to the construction company of the above apartment complex, and the construction cost has been excessive. However, the injured party did not accept bribe or appropriate construction cost in the process of selecting the construction company of the above apartment complex, and the defendants did not accept bribe in the process of selecting the construction company of the above apartment complex, and the representative at the time of the tenant representative of the victimized party

G was merely a vague trend that “the victim was given entertainment from the side of the company in the process of selecting a construction company for the facilities for the joint development of apartment complex,” and that the victim was given or received a bribe in connection with the above construction work, and the victim was at the time of the selection of the construction company for the facilities for the joint development of heat and the construction cost excessively appropriated in the course of the selection of the construction company for the joint development of heat.

shall be deemed to have been approved.