Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, who was in office as an auditor of the representative meeting of the occupants of Ansan-si, and was in charge of the work related to the construction, including the selection of the re-do head and the joint construction work for heating repair, which was being promoted from around 2016, together with the representatives of the occupants’ representatives D, and was in charge of the work.

On February 22, 2017, the Defendant, upon receiving a request from the Standing Director B of the Construction Business Chain Co., Ltd., Ltd. (F) to the effect that “The Defendant would help to select E as the contractor of the C apartment re-do and rupture repair work,” the Defendant would receive KRW 1,00,000,000 from the person in charge of the above construction and construction work, such as multi-family housing painting work (such as the head of the C apartment re-do and rupture repair work).

3.3. Minority 1,000,000 won, and the same year.

4.3. Minority: 3,000,000 won, and the same year.

8. It received a total of KRW 6,000,000 from around 30. Around 1,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property from B in exchange for an illegal solicitation in relation to the selection of the re-domination of C apartment and the joint repair contractor of C apartment.

2. Defendant B is a person who is in charge of the tasks such as re-doing and receiving orders for equal repair works, and the execution of related funds and execution of construction works, etc., as the regular director of construction business chain Co., Ltd., Ltd., such as the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu G building, H apartment-type painting and repair works.

The defendant from February 22, 2017 to the same year.

8. From around 30, as described in paragraph 1, to the auditor A of the above apartment complex with interest on the actual person in charge of the affairs of the construction, such as the re-building of C apartment complex, “a request to help the auditor A select a stock company as the contractor of the C apartment re-do and the frat-heat-heat-heat-heat-out construction work” was delivered KRW 6,00,000 in total over four occasions, along

In this respect, the Defendant offered property to A along with an illegal solicitation in relation to the selection of the re-domination of C apartment and the joint repair company of C apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each prosecution against I, J, K, L, M, N, andO.