1. The Defendant’s redemption disposition of KRW 83,163,50 against the Plaintiff on April 13, 2018 amounting to KRW 81,435,50.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who provides social services prescribed by the Act on the Use of Social Services and the Management of Vouchers (hereinafter “Social Services Vouchers Act”) while operating “C” in Daegu-gu Luxembourg-gun (hereinafter “instant clinic”).

(1) The non-registered personnel provided social services with social services, thus making an unfair claim for KRW 1,00,000.

② 14,364,985 won was unfairly claimed without preparing a record book on provision of services.

③ Although D, who is a human resource for providing social services, it claimed KRW 1,728,00 as if it actually provided social services.

B. On September 13, 2017, the Defendant conducted the on-site inspection of the instant clinic, and subsequently, on October 12, 2017, ordered the Plaintiff to recover the first warning and the unjust enrichment of KRW 17,148,985 for the following reasons:

(hereinafter referred to as “pre-service disposition”). (c)

Meanwhile, on the other hand, the head of the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City filed a complaint with the Daegu-gu Police Station for unjust claim for social service costs in the instant clinic, E (F) and G (H operation). On October 31, 2017, the head of the Daegu-gu Police Station notified the Defendant of the investigation results that “The Plaintiff was actually claiming KRW 83,163,500,00 in total, even if D did not provide social service in the instant clinic from around 2015 to around 2017.”

Accordingly, on April 13, 2018, the defendant filed a claim with the plaintiff for the cost of providing social services by fraudulent or other illegal means, even if D did not provide social services, and received payment by fraudulent or other improper means. The defendant issued a disposition of restitution of the cost of unfair claim amounting to KRW 83,163,50 and the disposition of suspension of business for six months.

hereinafter each of the instant restitution disposition, “the instant restitution disposition,” and “the instant case.”