A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around April 29, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D-Driving) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped Motor Vehicle”) (hereinafter “D-Ped

At night, there was a crosssection in which traffic is controlled by signal, etc. on the front side of the above road, and thus, the Defendant, who was engaged in driving, had a duty of care to properly operate the front left and right well, and to proceed with it in a safe way by properly manipulating the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving a breath in a state where he was under the influence of alcohol and did not keep the breath properly, and was under the influence of the breath in a state where he was under the influence of the Defendant, and the part behind the F QM3 car of the victim E (the age of 29) who was under the influence of the signal waiting in the front direction of the Defendant’s course was shocked into the front part of the said cruise car.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim G (33 years of age) who was a partner of the victim E and the said QM3 car due to the foregoing occupational negligence, respectively, for approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the time and time set forth in Paragraph 1, the Defendant driven a DNA cruise car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.103%, 0.10%, as seen above, from the first day of the Ima in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, 200 to the third-lane road in the Calton City, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si.

3. The Defendant injured by occupational negligence was driving the pertinent cruise car under the influence of alcohol at the time, place, as mentioned in Paragraph 1, and tried to stop the said cruise car and talk with the other party getting off the car.

at the time;