Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In fact, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the complainant B (57 tax, South Korea), the Defendant did not have an intention to pay the money to the employee of the office of a set-off factory, and did not have received 5 million won of the check as down payment under a contract with the set-off factory. Since there was no certain income, there was no intention or ability to pay the money borrowed from the complainant from the beginning.

Nevertheless

1. On January 11, 2016, the Defendant, by telephone, ordered the complainant to grant the 5 million won amount to a staff member working at the factory, who entered the order of export in Gyeonggi-do, while having a factory in which he/she had a factory in the virtue of the virtue of Gyeonggi-do.

D. D. L. L. L. L. 1.3 million won a monthly wage of 4 million won, if L. 1.3 million won absent due to lack of money.

After a week, he/she shall pay the down payment with the borrowed money.

“A false statement” received KRW 1,300,000 from the complainant on the same day as the truth.

2. On February 7, 2016, the Defendant, by telephone, entered the complainant with “five million won (5 million won) from the rooftop factory,” and should not withdraw by check.

It is necessary to pay interest on annual alliances, and if 100,000 won is leased, it shall be paid upon termination of the annual alliance.

“A false statement that received KRW 100,000 on the same day from the complainant who believed that the statement was true.”

3. On March 20, 2016, the Defendant had the complainant write down a contract with the internal-day office factory by telephone.

It is necessary to approach meals to the people, so that there is no money now, 130,000 won will be loaned to them, and it will be calculated in a lump sum together with the borrowed money before and after the end of the contract.

“A false statement was received KRW 30,00 from the complainant who believed that the statement was true on March 21, 2016.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the complainant, and 1.530,000 won was delivered and acquired through the delivery.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;