logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.08 2017고정1744
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On January 11, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months at the Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 6, 2018.

The defendant is a person who has no certain occupation, and the complainant is a person who is free from the management of C (State) in Gyeong-si, North America.

1. On November 7, 2014, the Defendant is aware of a large number of appraisers, is well aware of the date of brokerage, and is well aware of the fact-finding process, and partially revised and recognized the facts-finding process to the extent that it does not infringe on the Defendant’s right to defense. The complainant was detrimental to the appraisal of Gyeongcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and demanded KRW 2 million as travel travel expenses and borrowed name.

However, even if the defendant received KRW 2 million from the complainant under the above name, he did not intend to use it for the business trip expenses for the appraisal and assessment affairs.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving such deception, received KRW 1 million from the complainant to the new bank account in the name of E (F) and KRW 1 million from G to the corporate bank account in the name of G (H).

2. On November 14, 2014, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant: (a) made an appraisal report; and (b) made an appraisal report; and (c) made an appraisal report; and (d) made an appraisal appraiser’s drinking value necessary; and (c) changed the amount of KRW 12 million.”

However, there is no difference in appraisal, making a document of appraisal, and there is no ability or intention to pay for the value of the appraiser.

Nevertheless, such deception was received from the victim the amount of KRW 10 million to the corporate bank account (H) in the name of G, and two million to the new bank account (F) in the name of E.

3. On November 20, 2014, the Defendant: “In the field of the D Cosmetics Corporation, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, 2014, appraisers should not know about the value of appraisal and proceed well on the side; I would not proceed with the evaluation again; I would have to conduct personnel management to appraisers in the KET; 3 million won should be changed at personnel expenses.”

However, the defendant is given three million won to the complainants.

arrow