1. On November 21, 2017, the Defendant’s disposition that the Plaintiff was disqualified as a person subject to relocation measures shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On March 26, 2009, the Gyeongnam Do governor designated C’s urban development project project zones within C’s station area and formulated and announced a development plan.

On March 6, 2017, the Defendant, as a project implementer, announced the implementation of relocation measures for the station area development project, and among them, the criteria for the selection of those subject to relocation measures are as follows:

(D) In addition, the notice of the implementation of the relocation measures announced by the Defendant stated as follows: “The person who has resided in the project district concerned shall include the person who has resided in the project district concerned and his spouse or lineal ascendant or descendant has resided therein.”

(A) A person subject to relocation measures on March 26, 2009 (the date of announcement of designation of a district): A person subject to relocation measures on March 26, 2009 (the date of announcement of designation of a district): A person who continuously resides in a house (excluding an unauthorized house and a house owned by a corporation or organization after January 24, 1989) in the relevant project district and is removed according to the relevant project from the date of notification under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes until the date of conclusion of a contract or the date of adjudication of expropriation;

B. From June 7, 1994, the Plaintiff’s husband E owned the F written adjudication (A 6) 1 pages, etc. in Jinju-si located in the project site above, see the G-based housing (hereinafter “instant housing”) and continued to reside in the instant housing after making a move-in report under the Resident Registration Act on June 25, 1994.

Plaintiff

In addition, on October 13, 1994, a move-in report was made to the instant house and resided therein. However, on July 2, 2007, a move-in report was made to the H apartment I (hereinafter “H apartment”) and made a move-in report again on May 22, 2009.

E on June 20, 2012, the housing of this case was sold through consultation at Jinju, a project implementer, and accordingly, E and the Plaintiff residing in the housing of this case on February 4, 2013.