logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단3088
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Northern District Court on March 26, 2009, and a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the Seoul Western District Court on April 20, 2016.

1. On May 23, 2016, the Defendant driven CWz E220 CDI car under the influence of alcohol content 0.129% without obtaining a driver’s license on a road where the address of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Maamamamb and below is unknown, and at around 00:28, the Defendant driven CWz E220 CDI car under the influence of alcohol content 0.129% without obtaining a driver’s license on a road where the address of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Maambamb and is not known.

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document was in possession of a person who was requested to produce a driver’s license on the ground of drinking by police officers E slope belonging to the Seongbuk Police Station D, Seoul, Seongbuk Police Station D, which was under the influence of alcohol at the same time and place under the above paragraph (1) and subsequently illegally displayed official document by presenting the driver’s license as his identification witness.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1) above, forged the Defendant’s signature by signing the name F on the junishing report and the junishing report on the junishing driver’s license and the junishing report on the junishing driver’s license and the junishing driver’s license without authority, for the purpose of exercising the authority to request the Defendant to affix his signature on the junishing driver’s license and the junishing report on the junishing driver’s license, in which the Es

4. The suspect at the time and at the place specified in paragraph (3) and without authority, issued the master initiative report and the master driver initiative report, signed without authority, to E assistant of the police officer affiliated with the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk Police Station D, as if he were a legitimate signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the statement of the status of a driver, a report on the status of a driver, and the status of a driver;

arrow