Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant was a former employee of the Victim B, was dismissed from the Victim Company, the Defendant had expressed false facts to the company that concluded the contract of carriage with the Victim Company, and had the victim Company suffered losses.

Around March 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) purchased buses directly; (b) sold buses to the bus engineering audit room that entered into a transport contract with the victim company; and (c) did not engage in the transport business with the designated bus; and (d) sold cars, the Defendant: (a) sent phone called to the Hyundai Motor Engineering Audit Office that entered into a transport contract with the victim company and obstructed the transport business of the victim company by pointing out false facts to the extent that “B Co. is currently a civil lawsuit against C; (b) entered into a transport contract with the modern vehicle in the year 2013; (c) how B Co. entered into a transport contract with the designated vehicle; (d) how B Co., Ltd. entered into a transport contract with the designated vehicle; (d) how B Co., Ltd. entered into a transport contract with the designated vehicle; and (e) how B Co., Ltd. spreads false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. A written petition;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime (a point of defamation) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the order of provisional payment under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;