logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.20 2017고단1702
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B as a safety manager of D Company D, the site manager of F Remodeling Corporation E in the former Northern Group E, and the Defendant A is a person engaged in the driving of G cargo cars with a hydrotension strawle.

around 10:30 on September 7, 2016, the Defendants used a stack installed in the foregoing cargo vehicle at the construction site of the F Remodeling to transfer the pump to two floors, along with the victim H (65 tax).

In such a case, Defendant B, as a field manager and a person in charge of occupational safety and health, has a duty of care to assign water signal staff to prevent safety accidents, train materials to wear safety equipment, such as safety caps, while providing safety equipment. Defendant A had a duty of care to ensure safety so that water pumps do not face a structure by accurately adjusting the water pumps at least two places at the bottom of the water, while Defendant A had a duty of care to ensure that water pumps do not face a structure.

Nevertheless, Defendant B did not provide safety equipment, such as safety appearance, to the victim and Defendant A. Defendant A did not provide safety equipment, and Defendant A did not provide safety equipment, but did not provide safety equipment for the victim’s head who did not wear safety equipment, but did not use safety equipment for the part of the head of the victim. Defendant A, who was engaged in the work by binding only one part of the erop pumps at one location from among the erop pumps. The erop, which is bound to the erop to the erop of the erop, due to the eronom’s failure to handle the erop.g.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit the above occupational negligence, thereby resulting in injury to the victim, such as blood transfusion, which is difficult to know the number of days of treatment.

arrow