logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.11.29 2019고단1026
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

Defendant

A and B fail to pay each of the above penalties.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A As the representative of Defendant C Co., Ltd. in the window E of Changwon-si, Defendant C Co., Ltd. is an employer at the site of the “G” construction work (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction work”) undertaken in Echeon-si F, and Defendant B is a business owner who is a representative of Defendant D Co., Ltd. with the wife population H, and Defendant D Co., Ltd with the sixth floor around January 24, 2019 and performs the construction work of the instant construction work from Defendant A by receiving a supply of and demand for windows, glass, and metal construction work.

1. Defendants A and B’s occupational negligence, Defendant A’s violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act on May 7, 2019, Defendant B’s violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and Defendant B’s violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, around 11:40 May 7, 2019, caused the victim I (the age of 49) who is an employee of D Co., Ltd. at the construction site of the instant construction to work for the scar 2.5 meters above the ground 2.5 meters above building reinforcement glass windows.

Defendant

B As a business owner engaged in a business by using victims, in order to prevent the danger at a place where the worker is at the risk of fall, B is obligated to reinforce safety facilities, such as safety belts, in a structure with sufficient strengths, and have workers perform work in a state where safety outfits, such as safety caps, etc., are mandatorily worn, and prevent safety accidents. Defendant A, a contractor, has the duty to take measures to prevent industrial accidents, such as the installation of safety caps, etc. and the wearing of safety outfits, in a place where the worker employed by Defendant B, is at the risk of fall. However, the Defendants neglected the duty to take measures to prevent industrial accidents, such as wearing the duty of safety outfits. However, the Defendants neglected to do so and caused the victim to do so without wearing the safety caps and the safety bell in the form where the front and right rail is dismantled.

Ultimately, the Defendants are occupational negligence as above.

arrow