Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.
Defendant
A and B fail to pay each of the above penalties.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A As the representative of Defendant C Co., Ltd. in the window E of Changwon-si, Defendant C Co., Ltd. is an employer at the site of the “G” construction work (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction work”) undertaken in Echeon-si F, and Defendant B is a business owner who is a representative of Defendant D Co., Ltd. with the wife population H, and Defendant D Co., Ltd with the sixth floor around January 24, 2019 and performs the construction work of the instant construction work from Defendant A by receiving a supply of and demand for windows, glass, and metal construction work.
1. Defendants A and B’s occupational negligence, Defendant A’s violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act on May 7, 2019, Defendant B’s violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and Defendant B’s violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, around 11:40 May 7, 2019, caused the victim I (the age of 49) who is an employee of D Co., Ltd. at the construction site of the instant construction to work for the scar 2.5 meters above the ground 2.5 meters above building reinforcement glass windows.
Defendant
B As a business owner engaged in a business by using victims, in order to prevent the danger at a place where the worker is at the risk of fall, B is obligated to reinforce safety facilities, such as safety belts, in a structure with sufficient strengths, and have workers perform work in a state where safety outfits, such as safety caps, etc., are mandatorily worn, and prevent safety accidents. Defendant A, a contractor, has the duty to take measures to prevent industrial accidents, such as the installation of safety caps, etc. and the wearing of safety outfits, in a place where the worker employed by Defendant B, is at the risk of fall. However, the Defendants neglected the duty to take measures to prevent industrial accidents, such as wearing the duty of safety outfits. However, the Defendants neglected to do so and caused the victim to do so without wearing the safety caps and the safety bell in the form where the front and right rail is dismantled.
Ultimately, the Defendants are occupational negligence as above.