beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of two years and a short term of one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
As an employee of the so-called “singishing”, a name-free person: (a) entices a victim to withdraw money from the Defendant, etc. by deceiving an unspecified number of victims, by misrepresenting the inspection; and (b) the Defendant, etc. conspiredd to commit the singishing fraud by deceiving the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service; and (c) remitting money to the sing organization by receiving cash from the injured party.
On October 12, 2017, at around 13:50 on October 12, 2017, the name Buddhistist of the name was the fact that he/she was influencing that he/she acquired the money through the phishing crime, but concealed it to the victim C, and misrepresented the victim with the investigation officer and the prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Court by phoneing him/her, and “It is necessary to investigate whether he/she is a perpetrator or the E bank passbook was used as a passbook. It is necessary for the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service to confirm whether his/her account is related to a crime, and then withdraw his/her deposit and deliver it to the Financial Supervisory Service staff of the Financial Supervisory Service on October 12, 2017, the victim C was delivered cash 7,500,000 won withdrawn by Han River-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 16:00 on October 16, 200 to the Defendant, who received the name of the victim, as if he/she was an employee of the victim.
As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with a name-free winner, etc., committed the crime from the date of the crime to October 23, 2017, in the same manner, “YJ” in the place No. 1 attached to the List of Crimes attached to the List of Crimes from the date of the crime, is a clerical error in the Han River 3 A, and “J” in the place No. 3 attached to the List of Crimes, is a clerical error in the name of “K”.
In four times as described, the victims were urged to receive a total of 35,478,781 won.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to F, C, G, and H;
1. A copy of account statement;
1. The investigation report (the victim I and the victim F is the suspect.