logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고단2698
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2016, the Defendant appeared at the Busan District Court 353, the Busan District Court 353, the Busan District Court 945, as a witness of the fraud case, and tried to notify the presiding judge of the right to refuse to testify.

The above case states that "A shall not have an intention or ability to repay money even if it borrowed money from D, it shall be deemed that D shall not have an intention or ability to repay the money, and it shall be deemed that D shall have received KRW 7 million from C to the National Bank account of C in the name of borrowing money on or around March 8, 2013, by falsely stating that "A shall lend the money immediately after the purchase of the land registered in the name of Dong and Dong shall be repaid," and that D shall not have any purport to the effect that D shall not be paid the money in the above amount of KRW 8 million,000,000 from the purchase of the land to D again on or around July 12, 2013, and it shall be deemed that D shall have received KRW 1 million from the purchase of the land to the National Bank account of C, and that D shall not have any purport to the effect that D shall not have paid the money in the above amount.

Nevertheless, it is necessary for the Defendant to see that the Defendant “I see without doubt” of the Prosecutor.

7 million won and 1 million won in 100,000 won are required to be given to the question, “Sado-in Do-in Sado-in Sado-in Sado-in.”

“In response,” and the presiding judge shall make a decision to grant 8 million won to the defendant at the location of the defendant who is a witness and within the family of the defendant.

The decision on the extension of the fee will be made.

The testimony was made as ‘for example’ in the question of whether this talked or not.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Copies of the trial records (2016 high court records, 945), copies of the examination of witnesses, and copies of the recording records;

1. A copy of the judgment (2016 High Court Decision 945, 2016 High Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 945, 2016 High Court Decision 3717 High Court Decision);

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D.

arrow