logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.02.11 2014가단218881
용역비
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As a housing site was created in the above Japan-gu Seoul Urban Development Project, the issue of the relocation of the Defendant, E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and F (hereinafter “F”) who operates a factory in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D D in the Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

B. Goyang-si and E concluded an agreement on June 14, 2012 to share the work for the relocation of E’s place of business.

C. Since then, E requested the Plaintiff to prepare a report on the feasibility of an urban development project in order to submit it in ancient cities, and on September 25, 2013, the following technical services agreements were drafted:

The “contractor(B)” column of the above contract includes the Plaintiff, and the “project owner(A)” column includes E, Defendant and F, and the Plaintiff, E, and F affix their seals and seals, but the Defendant’s seal is omitted.

(A) A contract entered into on the basis of the above contract (hereinafter referred to as the “instant service contract”). - The name of service: The contract amount of 121,000,000 won (including value-added tax) for the urban development plan and feasibility analysis service of the transferred land in Yongsan-si: the contract period: the service of Article 1 (Purpose and Effect of Services) is entrusted to the Plaintiff by the date of completion of the operation specified in this contract from the contract date of the contract to the date of completion of the operation of the task specified in this contract; the purpose of this service is to prescribe matters necessary for the Plaintiff to perform the urban development plan and feasibility analysis service of the transferred urban development area in Goyang-si, and the effect is to be effective

Article 6 (Payment Method) The total amount of the service charges that “A” pays to the Plaintiff shall be KRW 10,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) for the service charges that “A” pays to the Plaintiff within one week after the completion of the consultation at the time of the rest of 330 weeks within one week from the date of the conclusion of the agreement on the commencement of the contract on the commencement of the payment of KRW 550,00,000, within one week from the date of the conclusion of the agreement on the commencement of the payment of KRW 50,00,000, and “A” shall be in accordance with the following standards:

arrow