The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant did not insult the victims while hearing D professors; and (b) did so even if so, the Defendant made such remarks.

Even if it is deemed that there is no possibility of dissemination in light of the relationship between D professors and victims, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the credibility of the statements made by D and victims or the possibility of dissemination, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. We examine the judgment of the court below, and the defendant asserted the same purport as the above reasons for appeal, and the court below rejected the defendant's assertion on the ground that performance is recognized in light of the fact that the defendant made a statement to D as stated in the facts charged in this case, and the defendant expressed an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that may undermine the social evaluation of the victims, which constitutes insult, and the relation between the defendant and D, victims, and D spread the contents of the defendant's statement to the foundation. In comparison with the records, we examine the above judgment of the court below, we affirm the judgment of the court below as just, and there is no error of law of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as alleged by the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.