A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2016, the Defendant refers to the Victim E and Victim F at the C University D D D professor Office in Incheon-si around August 31, 2016, and “E and F” refers to the loyalty of the Foundation.

F The professor Council was established, and the person who was born once was born is also the subject of the worship, and the F publicly insultingd the victims, stating that “F is the same person as the third party’s son.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statements of E, F, and D;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E, F, and D;

1. Complaints filed for the E or F preparation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the recording of remarks;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (a punishment imposed on a victim F with heavier punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant does not have the same words as the statement of facts constituting a crime.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the court recognizes the fact that the defendant made a statement to D as stated in the facts of the crime, and this constitutes insult as an expression of abstract judgment or anti-destructive sentiment that could undermine the social evaluation of the victims, and public performance is recognized in light of the relationship between the defendant and D, victims, and D’s spread of the statement of the defendant to the persons related to the foundation.

Defendant

We cannot accept the assertion of defense counsel.

A. D refers to “a foundation’s loyalty” and “a person who is in a three-way position” and “a person who is in a three-way position,” both of which refer to “a person who is in a three-way position,” and “a person who is in a three-way position,” where the victim F was in a specific and consistent manner from an investigative agency to this court.