1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 7, 2014, between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant-related Plaintiff’s relation architect office (hereinafter “Plaintiff-Appellee”) and the Plaintiff Lee Dual Certified architect office (hereinafter “Plaintiff-based”) entered into a construction supervision service contract for the construction supervision of B elementary school teachers (hereinafter “instant teachers”) ordered by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant construction”) between the Public Procurement Service and the Public Procurement Service (hereinafter “instant construction supervision contract”).

(The share of the Plaintiff is 86%, and the Plaintiff’s interest is 14%). The Plaintiff’s temporary termination of the Plaintiff’s C and D are the E of the Plaintiff’s temporary termination of the employment.

B. On March 30, 2015, which is the date of completion of the agreement, the Plaintiff’s supervisor A, D, etc., who belongs to the Plaintiff Company, submitted a completion inspection report on the completion of construction to the Plaintiff Company. The Plaintiff et al. pointed out and returned the ratification construction port once, and submitted a completion inspection report again on April 2, 2015, upon supplementing the points pointed out, the Plaintiff et al. submitted the completion inspection report to the Defendant on April 2, 2015. The Plaintiff et al. submitted to the Defendant the completion inspection report stating that “A recognizes that the construction was completed before the completion of construction in accordance with the design documents, quality control standards, and other agreements throughout the entire construction work,” and D submitted the completion inspection report to the Plaintiff, respectively.

C. On April 3, 2015, the Defendant’s cadastral records and measures found that there was a total of 17 pages in the attached Table 1 with respect to the construction, and a total of 15 pages in the attached Table 2 with respect to machinery and equipment as stated in the attached Table 1, and demanded the Plaintiffs to undergo a completion inspection after the completion of the measure, returning the completion inspection to the Plaintiffs on April 6, 2015.

One of the above points is in the inner concrete retaining wall in order to support the external brick of the building.