1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The scope of the judgment in this Court claimed against the defendant for active property damage caused by flood accidents, the plaintiff's own mental damage, and the mental damage caused by the plaintiff's employees. The court of first instance partly accepted the active property damage, and dismissed all the remaining claims.

On the other hand, only the plaintiff appealed against this, only the active property damage partially dismissed and the plaintiff's own mental damage, and did not appeal for mental damage of the plaintiff's employees.

Therefore, the scope of the trial of the party is limited to the Plaintiff’s active property damage and the Plaintiff’s claim for mental damage.

2. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court's explanation of this case is to recognize "a person who will be recognized" as "a person who will belong to the court of first instance"; (b) the defendant's "the defendant" as "the plaintiff's ownership"; and (c) the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than deletion of "the consolation money for emotional distress of the plaintiff's employees" as "the part of the judgment of the court of first instance" as "the part of the judgment of the court of first instance," and (d) the part of the judgment

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is concluded, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.