beta
Text
1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff claimed the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff’s passive loss, affirmative loss, and solatium due to the instant accident. The court of first instance accepted part of the Plaintiff’s respective damages alleged and rendered a judgment dismissing the remainder of the claims.
Plaintiff
In addition, since the defendant appealed only to the passive and affirmative damages of the judgment of the court of first instance, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the plaintiff's passive and affirmative damages caused by the accident of this case.
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the Firing Automobiles owned by E. (2) A, around 20:00 on May 18, 201, driven the said firing Motor Vehicle and driven the said firing Motor Vehicle into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the Firing Motor Vehicles owned by E, while driving the said firing Motor Vehicle at a speed of about 50 to 60 km away from the fircing apartment to the front intersection of the Cheongwon-dong Office located in the Cheongdong-dong, Incheon Metropolitan City along two-lanes, passing through the yellow signal in violation of the signal at a speed of about 50 to 60 km away from the front intersection of the said Motor Vehicle, making the Plaintiff crossing the firing the crosswalk from the left side of the said Motor Vehicle to the right fircing road.
(3) As a result, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as the pelvise, the pelvise bell, the pelvise bell, the left side, and the negoal marine, etc. 4) D is the Plaintiff’s father and father, and B was the Plaintiff’s mother and mother (the Plaintiff was actually raising at the time of the instant accident, and was adopted on May 8, 2013, which was after the instant accident) and C was the Plaintiff’s mother and mother.
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the above passenger car.
(c)to examine the limitation of liability, as a whole the arguments in each entry of Gap evidence 6, 13-6 to 11, 18-20.