logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.24 2017가단31825
전세보증금 반환
Text

1. The Defendant (Appointed Party) KRW 33 million to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), KRW 45 million to the Selection C, and KRW 34 million to the Appointor D.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. G and H, the owner of the second floor building located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) from G and H paid KRW 33 million on October 22, 1997; KRW 45 million on September 11, 1994; KRW 45 million on the former lease deposit; KRW 45 million on September 11, 1994; KRW 34 million on October 20, 1996; KRW 34 million on the former lease deposit; and KRW 1,5 million on April 9, 1995; and KRW 45 million on the designated party E, respectively, and reside in the building.

B. As the price of the day around the building, including the above building, was included in the J Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Zone, the Plaintiffs completed their migration since December 2, 2017. However, G (the death of April 14, 2012) (K, L, and M) had already died, and its children (K, L, and M) have renounced inheritance. The lineal ascendant N, andO of G, the second heir, shall be the heir of G, who already died and were the third heir of G, and the third heir of G, who was the first heir. The third heir other than the Defendant, renounced inheritance, and the Defendant inherited G’s property alone.

C. Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in the purport of the claim to the plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointeds.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow