Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 30, 2017, Defendant A was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground of the fact that: (a) the Defendant received a report from 112 that “two male persons are going to singing rooms” at a singing room located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 30, 2017; and (b) the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on the basis of the fact that he was employed by the police officer F and G, etc. employed by the Defendant for the said singing room.

A. During the above arrest process, the Defendant damaged the public goods by putting the back seat of the patrol vehicle into the door of the front seat of the patrol vehicle, and continuously walking the front part of the said rear seat inside the patrol vehicle with the view to walking the front part of the said rear seat, and thereby damaging the goods used by public offices, such as attaching a coverr of the vehicle.

B. During the above arrest process, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report Report. The Defendant was sealed by two descendants with the above G, and was taken by the chest of the above G with his head, and obstructed the police officer’s lawful execution of duties.

2. Defendant B

A. Around 04:00 on July 30, 2017, the Defendant damaged goods for public use, as seen above, the police officers attempted to arrest a flagrant offender A who is an friendly son and to bring the goods into the E area, and subsequently damaged goods used by public offices, such as taking the boomer attached to the back seat of the patrol police officer’s hand, and taking the boomer attached to the lower seat of the patrol officer’s hand.

B. As indicated in the above 2-A, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, as indicated in the above 2-A, arrested a person committing a flagrant offense against A who is friendly and brought the police officer into the E area, sealed the above police officer in two hand, and puts the F into two hand.

Before 112, the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases was hindered.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to submit a written estimate on a global vehicle and a written statement that interferes with the performance of official duties to A);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;