The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, etc., and was sentenced to five years on January 5, 2016. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury by organizations, etc.) to the Suwon District Court on April 19, 2016 and is still pending in the appellate court as a joint trial.

On March 3, 2016, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the Defendant’s violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury by organizations, etc.) against the above court’s 2015Gohap619C, in the Suwon District Court No. 108, the Suwon District Court No. 120 of Suwon-si World Cup 10, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

The Defendant testified to the presiding judge D of the above court that “Around 01:40 on Nov. 8, 2014, the Defendant testified to the effect that “Around 01:40, the Defendant did not receive the Defendant’s order to retaliation against the epidemistor C in relation to the case where he found He who was in the Gju located in Suwon-si F in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, as well as the staff in charge of the management of the radio waves.”

However, the facts were that the Defendant received the direction from C to retaliation against the reverse radio waves organization members before the calendar, and delivered it to E, and subsequently, the Defendant inflicted an injury on H, which caused the reverse radio waves organization in the above location.

Accordingly, the defendant gave false testimony contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Protocol of the trial of Suwon District Court 2015 High Court 619, 419 and recording records of the examination of witnesses against A;

1. Suwon District Court 2015 Highly 619 Anti-Monopos (A);

1. The Seoul High Court Decision 2016No234;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, correspondence reports by individuals, current status of confinement by individuals, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;