logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.09.09 2015고단1
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Defendant A’s body in the facts charged is a person with a studio, Defendant B is a simple fluorial body, Defendant B is a victim, and the victim D is an employee of the 20th century who works in the front of the building in Busan Shipping Daegu E in the commercial building by providing and leasing three meters in front of the building in the commercial committee from July to August 2, 2018, and managing the whole three meters of the building in front of the building in the commercial committee. On July 13, 2014, the Defendants found the above building in the underground management office of the building in the building in the above commercial building in order to carry out funeral services in the front of the building in the commercial building in the above 20th place, and the Defendant A was the victim, who had been in the same place, had the victim expressed the door of the Defendant’s gludial body.

If only the name in the city is talked within the city, all of them shall not be made.

Therefore, funeral service to be performed.

Defendant B refers to “ponner” and “ponner” refers to funeral services.

In the other part, the hospital expenses will be reduced by the internal fee, and if it is difficult to do so, us may also have power.

The defendant B said that he did not accept the above demands of the defendants while he was to respond to it, he acted as if he would inflict any danger and injury on the victim.

Since then, from July 21, 2014 to July 25, 2014, Defendants were engaged in ice cream sales services without paying rent at the above e-market street store by putting hotly on the ground that they are organized violence as above.

As a result, the Defendants jointly got off the payment of the amount equivalent to 5 million won, which is the amount equivalent to the street store rent from the victim who frightened the victim as above, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to that amount.

2. According to the records, the Defendants’ words and actions seem to have committed organized violence and breach of trust despite D’s refusal, and they started funeral at the street point, and performed funeral services more than five days after D’s report to the police.

arrow