Defendant

A shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged against Defendant A, in collusion with Defendant B on April 7, 2017, the Defendant introduced the victim F and G at the coffee shop located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, as the managing director of the L-gu, the representative of the K-gu, the Defendant, and the Defendant of the Defendant to the K-gu, at around 11:30 on April 7, 2017.

It is possible to borrow 12 billion won if a building has been used as a collateral and a loan agreement is made with bank employees, and if a bank is submitted only to appraisal of the building, it will be 12 billion won loan. Therefore, it will pay 40 million won within a week of lending 25 million won at the cost of receiving appraisal.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant, B, and C did not have the right to own or dispose of the above Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan MM building as collateral and did not have the ability to operate the business. Even if they borrowed money to the victims, the victims did not have the intent or ability to repay the money, they deceiving the victims, and they received the total of KRW 12.5 million from the victim G and the total of KRW 12.5 million from the victim G.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant and the Defendant and the Defendant merely guaranteed the victims to borrow expenses incurred in receiving appraisal in relation to the loan of M, and did not know that C, B, etc. had no intent or ability to repay them even if they were borrowed from the victims, they did not participate in the crime of fraud.

3. Comprehensively taking account of each evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, the Defendant was aware of Defendant B, who is the representative director, and the Defendant was employed by 10 employees to engage in the leisure business for N.