A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2015, at around 00:15, the Defendant stated that the victim D, operated by the victim D in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, failed to calculate the food value, and the victim of the defect about to go out, “this rings and spers” was expressed as “this rings” on the ground that the victim was prevented, and that he was released on the bottom of the beer, and caused the customers to leave the 30-minutes at that place.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration, such as the fact that there is a previous conviction of a fine in the last ten years, that the degree of damage is difficult to see that the degree of damage is significant, that there is a mistake and misunderstanding, that there is a smooth agreement with the victim);

1. The main sentence of Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on Probation;