The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On June 15, 201, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s property without the victim’s permission, 2 thieves (10m, length 10m and 10m m/ length / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m / 10m)

B. From October 14, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 18:30 on October 14, 201, the Defendant purchased and used trophosomes used in the bale-type 2,600,000 won under the condition that the Defendant bears half of the Defendant’s father’s father at the house of the victim in the Jeonnam-gun-gun, Namnam-gun, for the purpose of purchasing and using the trophos in the 2,600,000 won; (b) the Defendant stated that the Defendant “this balkhshshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

C. On October 16, 201, the Defendant: (a) caused the damage to property; (b) caused the damage to property by causing the Defendant’s use of a vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable veges

2. Determination

A. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements and injury diagnosis reports made by the police and her husband E in the police and court.

B. The statement of the victim is ① at the time of the preparation of the written complaint, and the defendant alleged that he was sponsed by telegraph at the time of the preparation of the written complaint, but at the time of the investigation conducted by the police, the victim was sprinked by the victim in order to defend the defendant when the victim tried to do so, and the victim's wife was sponsed by the victim in the process.