logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고단8611
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 19, 2014, at around 23:30 on August 19, 2014, the Defendant interfered with business, within the main point of “E” operated by the victim D, the victim D on the first floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul building C, Seoul, with the influence of the victim’s bar business by allowing customers who had the main point of avoiding disturbance, such as a string, drinking and drinking, to cut off the table table for event publicity without any justifiable reason while drinking. In addition, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s bar business by force.

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant expressed that the victim D (the 39 years of age) who observed the said disturbance was “Irrhs .....”, and expressed the victim’s desire to read “Irrhs ..................................”, the Defendant carried the victim’s freshing, freshing the fresh, freshing the fresh,

3. On August 20, 2014, at around 00:00, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of duties from the victim I, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Western Police StationF District, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving 112 report on obstruction of duties at the places prescribed in paragraph (1) on August 20, 2014; and (b) carried the victim’s left shoulder part of the victim, who was seated in the back seat of the police vehicle and was arrested as a flagrant offender at the charge of obstruction of duties from the victim I (the police officer aged 26).

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the defendant injured the victim about about 14 days of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to J, D, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Evidence Record 61, 72, 74);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the criminal facts;

1. Commercial concurrence;

arrow