The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: “The Defendant, at around 16:00 on September 19, 2015, brought a complaint against the victim E ( South, 67 years old) in the past due to the offense of insult against the Defendant in the “D direct trade market” located in Yasan-si, Yasan-si, the victim was injured by the victim’s thirical thirst, who driven the front wheelchairs on the part of the Defendant on the ground that the victim was exposed to the Defendant by using a mobile phone, and got the wheel so that the victim was exposed to the right growth of the victim’s right growth with the wheel so that the wheel would go beyond the victim’s growth with the wheel wheels, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as a thirth of the constru which requires approximately

“” is:

However, the evidence submitted by the witness E and F alone with each legal statement and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor was sufficient that the defendant had the intent to inflict an injury on the victim and caused the victim to reconcilate the electric vehicle with the intention to inflict an injury.

It is insufficient to recognize the defendant, such as the defendant's legal action, and the defendant merely displayed a dynamic vehicle in order to confirm the victim who photographs the defendant, and the possibility that the victim was exceeded in the process can not be ruled out.

Therefore, the article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant shall be acquitted and the summary of this decision shall be announced in accordance with the article 58 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.