logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.25 2015고합158
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

19,500,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power, etc.] On August 24, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act and 2 years of suspended execution on August 3, 2007 at the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 10, 2008 by being sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Seoul Southern District Court's Branch of September 4, 2008 and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 10, 2008, the above suspended sentence was invalidated, and sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment for the crime of forging private signature on December 10, 208, and the execution of the final sentence at the Ansan Prison was completed on December 24, 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant and D in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act are unemployed owners in the “F” game room in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-3, and G, upon introduction by the Defendant and D, attended and punished by the Defendant and D to the investigative agency on behalf of the owner of the business, received proposals to receive certain living expenses, attorney fees, etc. in return, and consented to such proposals, and work at the game room in the day, and work at the game room in the day. H is engaged in the overall management work such as collecting and settling cash inputd in the machine at night, and I conspired to exchange customers who request money in the game room by pretending to customers.

From August 11, 201 to August 26, 2011, the Defendant: (a) installed 50 game apparatus of “original constitutionalization”, which was modified to ensure that the background screen may appear repeatedly and continuously in contrast to the contents of the rating in the game in question from August 11, 2011; and (b) provided a large number of unspecified customers by employing employees J and K; (c) provided game products; (d) provided customers with 10,000 foot cash in the game machine; and (e) opened with the opening of the game in which customers enter the game machine; (e) the cellphone was automatically emitted when the main and certified low-sale machine was fluorized; and (e) the cphone was emitted as the phase is going.

arrow