The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of violation of the law of self-defense on June 14, 2012 among the facts charged in the instant case and violation of foreign law advisory provisions on foreign law, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on “legal affairs” as stipulated in Article 109 subparag. 1 of the Defense Act and “foreign law affairs” as stipulated in Article 46 subparag. 1 of the Foreign Legal Advice Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.