beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 17, 2007, the Defendant entered into a separate insurance contract with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “No. 1”) No. 1 as indicated in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “No. 2 insurance contract”) and No. 2 insurance contract as indicated in the attached Table 1 as of April 20, 209 (hereinafter “No. 2 insurance contract”), respectively. The instant insurance contract includes security matters for which the daily amount of hospitalization is to be paid when the insured is hospitalized due to illness or injury.
B. From March 5, 2010 to July 2, 2016, the Defendant received hospital treatment for 118,153,447 won in total from the Plaintiff for 1191, following the Defendant received hospital treatment for 1191, as shown in attached Table 2, due to the cryptitis, stoke, stoke stoke, stoke, stoke stoke, stoke stoke, and stoke s
C. The Defendant, including the instant insurance contract, concluded four insurance contracts with itself as the insured from May 17, 2007 to September 15, 2010. The specific details thereof are as follows: (a) the monthly insurance premium (cost) for the insurance company’s purchase date of insurance; and (b) the Plaintiff Non-dividend 1, on May 17, 2007, 17, 500, 44,057, 123 No. 123, 123, 2, 324, 74, 096, 324, 24, 324, 23, 24, and 15, 104, KB insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter the same shall apply) confirms that no Hyundai Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. did not pay dividends to the Plaintiff on April 20, 2010.
[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the court's order to submit each financial transaction information to Korea Post, KB Damage Insurance Co., Ltd., and interesting fire and marine insurance Co., Ltd., the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Judgment as to the main claim
A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the defendant concludes the insurance contract of this case for the purpose of unjust acquisition of insurance money through multiple insurance contracts.