beta
Text
1. It is confirmed that the defendant's lien as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet does not exist.
2...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The 16 co-owners of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cdong (hereinafter “Cdong”) who owned the instant reconstruction project on the ground of 1,084 square meters (hereinafter “EG”) remove the said apartment house around May 200, and divide the site into D large 510 square meters and F large 574 square meters (hereinafter “the instant building owner”) and the site was divided into D large 510 square meters and F large 574 square meters (hereinafter “the number up to the lot number”); one apartment unit (hereinafter “G Dong”); one apartment unit (hereinafter “G Dong”); and one apartment unit (hereinafter “H”), the size of 18 households on the D ground (hereinafter “H”); and one unit of G Dong and H Dong (hereinafter “the instant apartment building owner”) with the owner of the instant construction project (hereinafter “the instant building owner”).
2) While awarding a contract for the reconstruction project to the owner of the instant building, the owner of the instant building provided the I with the instant land, and the I newly constructed the instant apartment in return, and the remaining households agreed to sell the instant apartment to the owner of the instant building in general and appropriate funds for the construction cost and the project cost. 2) After which, among the owners of the instant building, up to eight persons, J et al. among the owners of the instant building, provide the owner of the instant
I, at the request of the I, suffer difficulties due to the shortage of funds, K et al., K et al.
To secure a loan of 600,000,000 won, with respect to the portion of land in this case owned by each of the parties on May 3, 2003, K had completed the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage with K, the maximum debt amount of 900,000,000 won, and the principal debtor I, and hereinafter "the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage in this case".
On May 6, 2003, K had guaranteed the obligation of I to K up to KRW 900,00,000.
3 I shall thereafter reconstruct the instant case.