1. Defendant J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R jointly with the Plaintiff and KRW 202,66,666, and KRW 168,00 for Plaintiff B.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government AAdong (hereinafter “A Dong”)

(3) Defendant K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, M, T, U,V, M, X, X, Y, and Z (hereinafter “Defendant’s owner”), each of the sectional owners of “AC-type” on the ground of AB large 1,084 square meters

Around May 200, the apartment house is removed and the apartment house is newly built (hereinafter referred to as “the reconstruction construction in this case”).

) The project was to be carried out (hereinafter referred to as “instant reconstruction project”).

(2) Accordingly, on June 30, 200, the Defendant’s owner divided AB large 1,084 square meters into AB large 510 square meters and AD large 574 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “the instant land”). The Defendant’s owner, who is the owner of the AB tenement, indicated only the lot number, and each of the said land collectively referred to as “the instant land”). Defendant K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, Q, S (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant AE Dong owner”), who is the owner of the AD ground, owned one apartment unit with 16 households on the AB ground (hereinafter referred to as “AE Dong”), and Defendant T, U, V, W, X,Y, and Z (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant AF Dong owner”), who is the owner of the AD land owner, decided to collectively construct the apartment unit on the AD ground scale 18 household size (hereinafter referred to as “AF Dong”) and the AF Dong.

B. Construction contracts and general sale, etc. with AG Co., Ltd. 1) Defendant building owners on May 13, 2002 (hereinafter “AG”)

(2) While awarding the reconstruction project of this case to AG, the owner of the building of this case provides the building of this case to AG, and the building owner of this case newly constructs the apartment of this case in consideration thereof, and the remaining households, who sell the apartment of this case to the Defendant owner, agreed to sell the apartment of this case in general to the Defendant owner and appropriate funds for the construction cost and the project cost.2) Accordingly, the Plaintiff stated in the sales contract of AE Dong on July 11, 2003 as the "AJ Dong" and the "AJdong" on July 11, 2003, but later, the "AJdong" was referred to as the "AE Dong" and the "AF Dong" as the "AF Dong" and the "AF Dong" respectively.