logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.05.30 2018고단1922
특수상해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 16, 2018, at around 00:42, Defendant A collected one of the victim E (n, 52 years of age) and one other, while drinking alcohol from the underground floor of the building C in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, with the victim, who was living together with the victim, on the ground that the victim’s booms and takes a bath, and she laid down on the boomer by gathering it on his/her hand.

The defendant continued to gather a beer, which is a dangerous thing, by gathering one beer's disease with left hand, and let the victim get out of the floor. The defendant gets out of the floor by dumping the flaps of the victim.

The Defendant, carrying a dangerous object and assaulted the victim, thereby committing an injury to the victim, focusing on an open two side, which requires treatment for about six weeks.

2. Defendant B, at around 01:10 on June 16, 2018, at the same place as Paragraph (1) and 112 on the same day, took the bath of Defendant B’s her failure to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the instant case involving the injury of the Defendant, namely, “When he is arrested due to any weather that he was arrested, she will be arrested, she will be arrested,” and the Defendant left the arms of the said police officer on his hand with other hand.

The Defendant continued to interfere with the arrest of the police officer by committing an assault, such as taking three times the fingers of the above police officer, making three times the fingers of the police officer, and smuggling once the chest, even though he received a warning that he could be arrested as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of each police statement of G and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to the attachment of field CCTV images);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Defendant B.

arrow