1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. On April 20, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) lent KRW 42,00,000 to the Defendant; (b) KRW 22,50,000,000 on May 31, 2012; and (c) KRW 42,00,000 on June 26, 2012.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 42,00,000 won with 20% interest per annum from the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of complete payment.

B.1) Determination 1) In order to determine the claim for return of KRW 15,00,00 as of April 20, 2015, and KRW 4,500,00 as of June 26, 2012, in order to recognize admissibility as evidence with factual relevance to the result of the inspection of a false horse detection device, first, a change in a certain psychological condition occurs, second, a change in the psychological condition must occur, second, a change in the psychological condition must cause a certain physiological reaction, third, an accurate determination of whether the speech of the person is false or not, and third, a false determination of the last physiological response should be 15,00,00,00, and in particular, a device can accurately measure the physiological response of the public prosecutor who consented to the inspection of the last time detection machine, and so long as it satisfies the requirement of the public prosecutor’s 205,000,000,000,000 as of June 26, 2012, 2015.

The result of the detection of false statements conducted by the Defendant in a criminal case against the Plaintiff as the crime of forging evidence No. 1-1 and evidence No. 16, and the Defendant’s false response.