1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was assigned to a police officer on April 21, 1979, and was promoted to the Inspector on September 1, 2008, and served in the Daejeon Western Police Station from February 17, 2014 to February 201.

B. The Plaintiff had a dispute with D, E, etc., a resident of the same apartment while working as the 120 representative of the Seo-gu Daejeon metropolitan apartment.

E, etc. filed a civil petition against the plaintiff several times in national newspapers, etc., and accordingly, in the Daejeon East Police Station Hearing Inspector Office, the plaintiff was investigated.

C. On September 28, 2012, the General Disciplinary Committee of the Daejeon East Police Station: (a) deemed that the Plaintiff violated the duty to maintain good faith and dignity under the State Public Officials Act; and (b) accordingly, (c) made a decision on February of the salary reduction to the Plaintiff; (d) accordingly, the Defendant was subject to a disciplinary measure for two months of salary reduction against the Plaintiff on the same day.

(hereinafter referred to as "the previous disposition in this case"). The ground for the first disciplinary action: F (the plaintiff voluntarily brought about F's resignation at the time of the special election for the head of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the Gu, and provided him with the reason for the second disciplinary action (the plaintiff did not disclose his name while the plaintiff was able to all residents of the special election for the head of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the Gu, and then G again shows it to F to F to resign from the representative of the representative of the representative of the representative of the council).