beta
Text
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is publicly announced.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. On March 15, 2018, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case of violation of the Consumer Cooperatives Act by the Incheon District Court No. 322 located in Nam-dong, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and took an oath, Defendant C testified to the effect that “Although, around September 2, 2014, the Defendant received two million won from H and paid the investment to the said money, the said money was paid as a borrowed money, and the said money was paid as a borrowed money, and it was not paid as a loan to the Plaintiff.”
However, in order for H and G to reproduce the appearance as if they meet the requirements for the establishment of the association, around August 28, 2014, G remitted 19,30,000 won to H with the said money, H wired the money equivalent to the amount of investment that each investor has to pay to the high-amount investor around September 2014, and received as its investments. One of the high-amount investors was also the Defendant, a person of the high-amount investor, also paid 2 million won from H around September 2, 2014 by means of the above method, and only lent the money in the name of the Defendant, but did not pay the money with the Defendant’s contribution, and thus, it was well known that the above 2 million won was not the borrowed money.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
B. The Defendant testified to the effect that, around 10:00 on March 29, 2018, at the court of Incheon District Court 322 located in Nam-dong, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of a violation of the Consumer Cooperatives Act against Defendant G, No. 2017 High Court Decision 2460, Sept. 2, 2014, Defendant D transferred KRW 800,000 from H around September 2, 2014, and paid KRW 500,000 among them under the name of Na, and KRW 300,000,000,000,000 won was made under her name. However, the said money was paid as a loan, and it was not paid by B and I only in the name of Na.”