1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 12, 2012, the Plaintiff suffered from an accident falling above (hereinafter “instant accident”) during the removal process, and was in the injury of “the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral dluoral dluoral dluoral dluoral dluoral dluoral dlusium, and the right-hand dluoral dlusium” (hereinafter “instant approved injury”). On October 24, 2012, the Plaintiff received the medical care approval from the Defendant

B. Thereafter, on March 26, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the recognition of the instant case aggravated, and that there was an unstable external disease (hereinafter “the instant additional medical care”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care and the additional medical care as to the knee knee and tension (hereinafter “the instant additional medical care”). However, on April 14, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff is not entitled to all applications for additional medical care and the additional medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “The additional medical care is less than the additional medical care cause without any change of symptoms compared to the time of the completion of the medical care, and “the knee kne se kne se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se s

C. Although the Plaintiff filed a petition for an examination against the instant disposition, the Plaintiff was dismissed on September 2014, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee filed a petition for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee, but was dismissed on December 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 4, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion aggravated compared to the time of treatment, resulting in the Plaintiff’s additional medical care. The instant additional medical care was also caused to the instant injury and disease.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case on a different premise is unlawful.

(b).