(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.10.21 2014고단200 (1)

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.10.21 2014고단200 (1)

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 200" Defendant awarded a subcontract for the construction of complex facilities in Ulsan-gun Co., Ltd. with the aim of being supplied with steel bars from E to use the name of G representative H, the actual representative of which is to prepare each contract.

1. Forgery of a private document on the standard contract agreement for construction works and uttering of a private research document;

A. On April 9, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: “The name of the ordering person shall be the name of the prime contractor: the construction of the D Complex Facilities in Ulsan-gun; the construction site: the contract amount: J of Ulsan-gun; the value of value-added tax (Won 2,310,000,000): The value-added tax shall be the one separate from the other; the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the name of the captain of the Busan-gun K, the other, the representative director: H: the name of G and the name of the representative director of H; and the other, the other, the name of G was the name of G corporation that the Defendant was newly kept in advance.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged two copies of the standard contract for construction works in the name of G Co., Ltd. representative H, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. 1) The Defendant, on its job, delivered one copy of the standard construction contract form for the construction work that was forged as if it were duly formed with the aim of receiving a supply of the construction work for the complex facilities in Ulsan-gun, a de facto representative L, a Co., Ltd., which is aware of the forgery. 2) On April 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00, issued one copy of the standard construction contract form for the construction work that was forged at the office of the E-company in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) around April 13, 2012, the Defendant exercised it by delivering one copy of the standard construction contract form for the construction work that was forged as if it was duly formed.

2. Forgery of private documents regarding a certificate of direct payment of the price of materials; and

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2020.08.27 2020고정445

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.04.10 2014고정144

-인천지방법원 2020.11.27 2020고단3927

-서울동부지방법원 2020.08.19 2020고단1307

-인천지방법원 2012.05.04 2011고합920