logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.09 2016나33669
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (1) The place of the first instance court's 3th judgment "in addition to the protective fence installed in the direction for installation and management of road safety facilities," and (2) the 4th judgment "No. 13" was added to the 5th judgment "No. 4th judgment," and the 5th judgment "No. 5th judgment," "No. 13th judgment," were added to the 4th judgment "No. 5th judgment," and the 4th judgment "No. 5th judgment," "the results of the fact inquiry about the chief executive officer of the Busan Southern Police Station and the Road Traffic Authority" were added to the 4th judgment of the first instance court, "the 5th judgment of the first instance judgment," and the 5th judgment of the first instance judgment "the 5th judgment of the first instance judgment," which "the 5th judgment of the first instance judgment, are not sufficient to recognize that the vehicle is being installed at the entrance of the road."

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

arrow