The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of imprisonment without prison labor and two years of suspended execution) of the lower court against the Defendant is deemed unreasonable.

2. The instant case is a matter that the Defendant was negligent in performing his/her duty of care in a child protection zone and received a relatively heavy injury for about 10 weeks in need of medical treatment, and thus the Defendant’s negligence is not weak.

However, the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, the defendant made efforts to recover damage by depositing five million won for the victim, and the vehicle of the defendant was covered by the automobile comprehensive insurance at the time of this case, the defendant's vehicle was not subject to any criminal punishment except a fine imposed on the defendant for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in around 2008, and there are no other criminal punishment records, and the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions provided for in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, environment, motive, means and consequence, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., and the range of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission, types of traffic crimes, types 1 (injury of traffic accidents): The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission: In full view of the possibility of suspended sentence on April to October (Basic Field area). Thus, the prosecutor's assertion

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.