The appeal by the prosecutor is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., indubity) of the original judgment (e.g., in six months of imprisonment without prison labor and in two years of suspended execution) is deemed unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case, which is judged, is operated by the defendant in the child protection zone.

In light of the degree of injury of the victim, the driver is not guilty of the occurrence of the traffic accident in this case, but is not guilty of the crime in light of the degree of injury of the victim, since the driver is not guilty of the traffic accident in this case, and is not guilty of the victim.

However, there are extenuating circumstances such as the defendant's mistake against himself/herself, there is no history of criminal punishment other than a fine one time, the defendant's additional agreement is expected to be made with the victim's side, and the damage recovery is expected to be made by the liability insurance. The occurrence of the traffic accident in this case appears to have contributed to the victim's negligence from his/her side by the alleyway, the economic situation of the defendant seems to be difficult, the defendant is also injured by the accident in this case, and the defendant's will also be faced with the defendant's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's wife's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result after the crime in this case, and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court on the crime in this case's case's crime in consideration of traffic crime group, type 1 (accident of traffic accident accident), the area of recommendation, recommendation (ad sentence).