Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for four months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was pened in depth and reflected; (b) deposited KRW 650,00 for the victim E; and (c) returned the amount of damage to the victim H and agreed to do so.

However, the crime of this case was committed by assaulting the victim E, who is not aware of the defendant, or destroying or damaging the property owned by the victim H because it was refused to lend money to the victim E, and the crime of this case was committed with heavy liability, without being aware of the period of suspension of execution, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of it during the period of suspension of execution, and there was no change in circumstances to change the sentencing after the decision of the court below was sentenced nine times. There is no change in circumstances to change the sentencing. The scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court Sentencing established by the Sentencing Commission is 4 months or more: thie crime: thieth, general property (type 2), theft for general property (type 2), decision on the recommended area (type 4 to 10 months), recommended sentencing range (type 1 to 10 months), general criminal motive, special person(type 1 to spambling), decision on the sentencing range (type 2 to 30 months or more).

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.