logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1972. 10. 31. 선고 72다1346 판결
[소유권이전등기][집20(3)민,087]
Main Issues

Since the State-owned river site is a property for public use, it may not be disposed of unless the management agency discontinues its use and transfers it to the Commissioner of the National Tax Service.

Summary of Judgment

Since the State-owned river site is a property for public use, it may not be disposed of unless the management agency discontinues its use and transfers it to the Commissioner of the National Tax Service.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 20 of the State Property Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Kim Woo

Defendant-Appellee

Korea

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 71Na617 decided June 23, 1972, Seoul High Court Decision 71Na617 decided June 23, 1972

Text

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

The Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal are as follows.

The court below held that even if Busan City Mayor entered into a contract for the exchange of 2 lots of land owned by the plaintiff (69 square meters and 112 square meters) in total (181 square meters and 181 square meters of Dong-dong, Dong-dong) and 181 square meters of the State-owned river site (Dong-dong (Dong-dong parcel number omitted), the above state-owned river site can not be disposed of unless the Busan City Mayor, which is a public water site, discontinues its use as a public water site and transfers it to the Commissioner of the National Tax Service without taking such a procedure, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the exchange contract is valid, and thus, it does not affect the conclusion of the judgment of the court below. Thus, even if the court below reviewed the evidence relation, it does not affect the conclusion of the court below, such as the above state-owned river site, the Busan City Mayor, which is a management agency of property for public use, and the head of the National Tax Service, did not accept the plaintiff's request for transfer registration of ownership.

Therefore, this appeal shall be dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by all members of the Civil Procedure Act by applying Article 89 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Supreme Court Judges Kim Young-chul (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Justice) Mag-gim Kim, Kim Jong-dae and Yang-Namng

arrow