1. The Defendant rendered a decision of performance recommendation with executory power in Busan District Court Decision 2017 Ghana41347.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the defendant, on August 17, 2017, based on the authentic copy of the decision of performance recommendation for transport fee cases No. 2017Gau41347, Busan District Court Decision No. 2017, Jun. 25, 2015, on which the plaintiff, based on the decision of performance recommendation as to new card No. 2014Gau30267, Jun. 25, 2015, he/she can recognize the fact that he/she was awarded a successful bid for each of the above movables in the Busan District Court Decision No. 2017, Jun. 25, 2015.

According to the above facts, since each movable mentioned in the separate sheet is not owned by B, but owned by the plaintiff, compulsory execution against each of the above movable should be excluded.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and accepted.