A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation, who is an applicant for compensation, KRW 60,000,00.

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2010, the Defendant stated the three-year indictment of imprisonment in the Daejeon District Court for fraud, etc., but in fact, the imprisonment was divided into two-year imprisonment and three-year imprisonment. In this case, and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act are three-year imprisonment.

On March 10, 2011, the above judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Around August 18, 2008, the Defendant introduced Gtel to the victim B at the E office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Songpa-gu, Seoul, to the effect that “I would register No. 601 and No. 603 of Gtel as of November 30, 2008, if I would transfer the amount of KRW 60 million at the low price if I would transfer the amount of KRW 60 million to the victim B at the low price.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not receive the instant officetel from H as a substitute payment, and merely concluded an entrustment contract with H and an officetel 12 and received the down payment with I as to the same officetel while promoting the sale and purchase. Moreover, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant did not have the right to sell and purchase the said officetel any longer due to the Defendant’s failure to perform the contractual obligations under the entrustment contract with H due to the discontinuance of the business due to the shortage of funds and the failure to complete the construction by the due date of the promise of the victims. The sales price of the amount of approximately 30% of the sales price of the sales price of the said officetel was significantly lower than the amount entrusted by the first H, and there was no intention or ability to sell the said officetel to the victim at a price significantly lower than the amount entrusted by the first H.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 60 million from the victim as the purchase price.

2. The victim C: