Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

1. On May 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the frontway of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on May 25, 2019; (b) on the ground that the victim C (the age of 55) was able to shot a bicycle and singing a bicycle, the victim called “to shotly,” and (c) the victim called “one-time,” the victim’s flab was flad with flab, and the victim’s face was flabed once by hand.

2. On May 25, 2019, at around 23:10 on May 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the emergency room of the E Hospital located in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, the Defendant: (b) demanded the victim F of the victim working for the officer in charge of the care to “not stating why the medical examination is required; (c) the victim, who is regularly treated outside the prison and provided counseling with the doctor in charge, expressed a large voice that “it is possible to issue a medical certificate stating the number of medical examinations after consultation with the doctor in charge; and (d) the victim, who gets off the receiving unit at his/her hand, gets off the emergency room, and was seated at the bed for the transport of the emergency patient.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the receipt, receipt, and guidance of the victim's emergency patients by force.

3. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from around 02:50 on May 26, 2019 to 04:00 on the same day: (a) at the Bupyeong-ro 33, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, 33, the Defendant was unable to bring an action against the police officer who was under the influence of alcohol to “a request the police officer to receive the assault case”; (b) at the same time, the police officer resisted that “the police officer was never receiving the violence case” to “a prompt investigation,” and to the police officer who recommended him to return home, “I were inside the police officer, so that these people are complying with our New,” and there was a great disturbance in the police officer who recommended him to return home.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Each police statement with respect to G and F.